- Deborah W. Denno, Neuroscientific Evidence in Context, Law and Mind: A Survey of Law and the Cognitive Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press 412-20 (Bartosz Brożek, Jaap Hage, & Nicole A. Vincent, eds. 2021)
- Bailey R. Ulbricht, Christopher Moxley, Mackenzie D. Austin and Molly D. Norburg, Digital Eyewitnesses: Using New Technologies to Authenticate Evidence in Human Rights Litigation, Stanford Law Review, April 2022
- Stephanie Akl, Amanda E. Temares, Brandi N. Diaz and Lenore E. Walker, Psychological Testing in Forensic Evaluations of Battered Women Who Kill, Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma
- Guy Alon, Azmi Haider and Hagit Hel-Or, Judicial Errors: Fake Imaging and the Modern Law of Evidence, UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law 21:82:2022
- Samuel Mazzuca, Regulating the Admissibility & Use of Sexual Inactivity Evidence in Criminal Cases, 70 Crim. L.Q. 161 (2022)
- Giulio Alvaro Cortesi, The Taking of Evidence. In: Proof and the Burden of Proof in International Investment Law. European Yearbook of International Economic Law 24. Springer, Cham (2022)
- Giulio Alvaro Cortesi. The Burden of Proof and Its Exceptions. In: Proof and the Burden of Proof in International Investment Law. European Yearbook of International Economic Law 24. Springer, Cham (2022)
- Tshepo Bogosi Mosaka, Here Is a Table: A Prolegomenon to a Future New Evidence Scholarship in Africa, 26 Int’l J. Evidence & Proof 178 (2022)
- Olivier Leclerc, Etienne Verges and Geraldine Vial, Turning a Graphical Method of Evidential Reasoning into an Operational Tool for Judges? Empirical Evidence, 26 Int’l J. Evidence & Proof 136 (2022)
- Kamari Maxine Clarke and Sara Kendall, ‘The beauty…is that it speaks for itself’: geospatial materials as evidentiary matters, Law Text Culture 23, 2019, 91-118
- E. A. Nakhova, The comparative analysis of the law of evidence in civil proceedings in France and Russia, Вестник СПбГУ. Право. 2022. Т. 13. Вып. 1
- Edited by Jordi Ferrer Beltrán and Carmen Vázquez, Evidential Legal Reasoning Crossing Civil Law and Common Law Traditions, Cambridge University Press
- Anibal Rosario Lebrón, A Wee Bit Racist: What are the Rules of Evidence, Alex?, The LSU Law Journal for Social Justice & Policy 6(1) (2022)
- Frederick Schauer, The Proof: Uses of Evidence in Law, Politics, and Everything Else, Harvard University Press (2022)
- Eric J. Engstrom, Forensic Psychiatry: Human Science in the Borderlands Between Crime and Madness. In D. McCallum ed., The Palgrave Handbook of the History of Human Sciences (2022)
- Alexius Leo, Kristiawanto and Marsudin Nainggolan, Application of Scientific Evidence as a Legitive Tool of Evidence in Criminal Acts of Violation of Environmental Quality Standards, European Journal of Research Development and Sustainability 3(5), 23-27.
- Zahri Kurniawan, H.S Tisnanta, M. Fakih and Ahmad Irzal Ferdiansyah, Exclusionary Rule Principle and Constitutional Rights Protection in Evidence Seeking, Int. J. Adv. Res. 10(04), 864-871
- Tess M.S. Neal, Kristy A. Martire, Jennifer L. Johan and Elizabeth M. Mathers, The Law Meets Psychological Expertise: Eight Best Practice Considerations for Evaluating the Quality of Forensic Psychological Assessments
- Ian Hunt, A critique of the literature on past convictions and the probability of guilt, Law, Probability and Risk 20(2) (2021), 113–133
- Charolette Caron, To Certify or Not to Certify? A Proposed Graduate Course and Universal Certification for Forensic Expert Witnesses, Merrimack Criminology Student Work
- John E.B. Myers and Jean Mercer, Parental Alienation in Family Court: Attacking Expert Testimony, Child and Family Law Journal 10(1) (2022)
- Gregory Mitchell and Brandon Garrett, Battling to a draw: Defense expert rebuttal can neutralize prosecution fingerprint evidence, Applied Cognitive Psychology 35 (2021), 976-987
- Suzie Dunn and Moira Aikenhead, On the Internet, Nobody Knows You are a Dog: Contested Authorship of Digital Evidence in Cases of Gender-Based Violence, 19:2 CJLT 371 (2022)
- Aliza Shatzman, The Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo: Persistent Evidentiary Challenges Facing the International Criminal Court, George Mason International Law Journal, Vol. 12:2 (2021)
- Jerameel Kevins, The Legal Profession and Money Laundering: Is Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Amendment Act 2021 An Aspersion on Advocate-Client Confidentiality? A Third Degree
- Kenneth W. Graham, Is a Question Hearsay?, UCLA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 22-17
- Mohamad Ismail Mohamad Yunus, Onus and Quantum of Proof for Breaching the Standard of Procedure during the Movement Control Order, Isu Khas/ Special Issue JUUM 37 – 43 (2021)
- Naciye Celebi, Qingzhong Liu and Muhammed Karatoprak, A Survey of Deep Fake Detection for Trial Courts, Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT)
- Marlee Rowe, Babe in the Woods: Why the Federal Rules of Evidence should Adopt a new Hearsay Exception to Protect Children, Arkansas Law Notes (2022)
- Thea Johnson, Lying at Plea Bargaining, Georgia State University Law Review 38(3) (2022)
- Rebecca Delfino, Deepfakes on Trial: a Call to Expand the Trial Judge’s Gatekeeping Role to Protect Legal Proceedings from Technological Fakery, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2022-02
- Darryl K. Brown, Batson V. Armstrong : Prosecutorial Bias and the Missing Evidence Problem, Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2022-31
- Christine Chambers Goodman and Kaitlyn Rubcich, California Evidence, California Litigation Review, pp 81-92, 2021
- Tracey Maclin, Is Silence Golden?, Ariz. L. Rev. (Forthcoming)
- Alexander A. Guerrero, The Interested Expert Problem and the Epistemology of Juries, Episteme 18(3), 428-452
- Owen D. Jones, The Future of Law and Neuroscience, 63 William & Mary L. Rev. 1317 (2022)
- Katharine L. Manning, Protecting the Constitution While Protecting Victims: Challenges to Pro Se Cross-Examination, 87 Brook. L. Rev. 1197 (2022)