- Marco Cecchi, How judges (should) deal with scientific evidence, BioLaw Journal N. 1S: Special Issue 1/2022
- Lutz Eidam, Michael Lindemann and Andreas Ransiek (eds.), Interrogation, Confession, and Truth: Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure, Nomos, Baden-Baden, Schriften zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht Band 43, 2020
- Giulia Vallar, Chapter 17: Authentic Instruments and Court Settlements, in Stefania Bariatti, Ilaria Viarengo, and Francesca Villata (eds.), EU Cross-Border Succession Law, Edward Elgar 2022
- Megan Evetts and Hamish Bevan, Wayback evidence: Admissible or inadmissible?, Intellectual Property Forum: Journal of the Intellectual and Industrial Property Society of Australia and New Zealand, Issue 128, June 2022
- Siyuan Chen, The impact of the rules of court 2021 on the law of evidence, Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law, 5 (2022)
- Hugh M. Mundy, Course Correction: A Proposal To Limit The Admissibility And Use of “Course Of Investigation” Testimony In Criminal Trials, UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review, 6(1) (2022)
- Elizabeth King, Rianne Letschert, Sam Garkawe, Erin Pobjie (eds.), Victim Advocacy before the International Criminal Court, Springer Cham 2022
- Jane Campbell Moriarty, The Inscrutability Problem: From First-Generation Forensic Science to Neuroimaging Evidence, Duquesne Law Review 60(2) (2022)
- Bailey R. Geller, A Dog’s Bark to Act as a Nark, Arkansas Law Review 75(2) (2022)
- Samuel J. Lutes, Does Sec. 18.001 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code Apply in Federal Court under the Erie Doctrine and the Federal Rules of Evidence?, 74 Baylor L. Rev. 252 (2022)
- Gauresh Chaudhary, Unfairly Prejudicial Evidence: No Law in Indian Jurisdiction, 5 Issue 2 Int’l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 1044 (2022)
- Timothy L. O’Brien , Stephen L. Hawkins and Adam Loesch, Scientific Disciplines and the Admissibility of Expert Evidence in Courts, Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World 8(2022)
- Jeffrey Pinsler, The Expert and the Hearsay Rule: Recent Developments and Proposals for Updating the Evidence Act, 34 SAcLJ 75 (2022)
- Zheng Ni and Yang Yang, Study on the Application of the Restrictive Admission in the Newly-Revised Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Evidence in Civil Procedures, Contemporary Social Sciences 3(7) (2022)
- Alan J S De Rochefort-Reynolds, Witness-Gating in International Commercial Arbitration: Can I Get a Witness?: CBS v CBP [2021] 1 SLR 935, 34 SAcLJ 229 (2022)
- Abhiroop Chakravarty and Vijay, Witnesses in the Criminal Justice System, 5 Issue 2 Int’l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 472 (2022)
- Chen Siuyan, Disclosure in Criminal Proceedings: Developments and Issues Ahead, 34 SAcLJ 51 (2022)
- Vincent-Arnaud Chappe, Romain Juston Morival, Olivier Leclerc, Demonstrate: Toward a Pragmatic Analysis of Evidentiary Activity, 110 Droit et Societe 7 (2022)
- Amit Kumar, G. K. Goswami, Edwin Huffine (eds.), Handbook of DNA Forensic Applications and Interpretation, Springer 2022
- Jonathan Ian Deans, Duthie v HMA: Clarification on Corroboration, 25 Edinburgh L. Rev. 377 (2021)
- Mohammad Amin Esmaeili and Seyed Jamal Seifi, From Legal Proof to Scientific Proof, International Journal of Health Sciences (2022)
- Zia Akhtar, The Rule Against Hearsay, Indigenous Claims and Story-Telling as Testimony in Canadian Courts, American Indian Law Journal 10(2) (2022)
- Ciu Shan, An Exploratory Study of Citizen’s Attitudes Toward the Exclusionary Rule in China, University of Macau
- Hisham Shakhatreh, The Obligatory Complementary Oath in Jordanian Law and Comparative Law, Public Administration and Law Review 2 (2022)
- Brandon L. Garrett, Glinda S. Cooper, and Quinn Beckham, Forensic Science in Legal Education, 51 J.L. & Educ. [i] (2022)