- Jonathan Federman and Kyle Fleck, Coerced Testimony of a Witness, as Opposed to the Fabrication of Evidence, Should Not Be Used as a Basis to Satisfy a Sec. 1983 Claim for Alleged Due Process Violations in an Underlying Criminal Matter, 55 UIC J. Marshall L. Rev. 40 (2022)
- Don Loeb and & Sebastián Reyes Molina, Standards of proof as competence norms, Jurisprudence (2022)
- Jurgis Bartkus, The Concept of the Admissibility of Evidence in Lithuanian Civil Procedure and Arbitration, Teisė 122 (2022)
- J.O. Okpara and Uchechukwu Uguru, Recent Developments in the Law of Evidence and Procedure Relating to Criminal Trials in Nigeria, Law and Social Justice Review 2(3) (2021)
- Rebecca Steele, Equalizing Access to Evidence: Criminal Defendants and the Stored Communications Act, The Yale Law Journal 131:1584 (2022)
- Eli Siems, Katherine Strandburg and Nicholas Vincent, Trade Secrecy and Innovation in Forensic Technology, Hastings Law Journal 73(3) (2022)
- Anutosh Mishra and Anant Mishra, Expert Evidence and Its Relevance, Jagannath University Research Journal II(II) (2021)
- Rahime Erbaş, Evidentiary Challenges to an Effective Criminal Investigation for Domestic Violence: An Introduction, The 10th Anniversary of The Istanbul Convention: Italian – Turkish Conference, ed. by Valentina Bonini & Rahime Erbaş, Pisa University Press, 2021
- Sean O’Brien, Quinn O’Brien, and Danna Cook, Put Down the Phone! The Standard for Witness Interviews is In-Person, Face-to-Face, One-on-One, 50 Hofstra Law Review 339 (2022)
- Brett Raffish, Making the Fourth Amendment ‘Real’ in Grand Jury Proceedings, Georgetown Journal of Law & Public Policy 19(2) 2021
- Jurkka Jämsä, Fair Trial Rules of Evidence: The Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights, Routledge 2022
- Wilson Jilala and Noel Lwoga, A brief history of forensic services in Tanzania: Current challenges and mitigation efforts, Forensic Science International: Synergy 4 (2022)
- Tess M.S. Neal, Kristy A. Martire, Jennifer L. Johan, Elizabeth M. Mathers and Randy K. Otto, The Law Meets Psychological Expertise: Eight Best Practices to Improve the Future of Forensic Psychological Assessment, Annual Review of Law & Social Science (2022)
- Simon BN Thompson, Misrepresentation of Expert Witness Testimony in Neurology for Neurological Sequalae and Disorders Explained by Situational Action Theory, Archives of Neurology & Neurological Disorders 5(1) (2022)
- Gustavo Ribeiro, [Marked Confidential]: Negative Externalities of Discovery Secrecy, Denver Law Review, forthcoming
- Nikolitsa Koutropoulou, Neurolaw and the Theory of Mind in the Courtroom: A Comparative Analysis of Greece and England
- Aviva Orenstein, Roger Park and Dale Nance, Evidence Law: A Student’s Guide to the Law of Evidence as Applied in American Trials. 5th ed., West Academic Publishing
- Suzie Dunn and Moira Aikenhead, On the Internet, Nobody Knows You are a Dog: Contested Authorship of Digital Evidence in Cases of Gender-based Violence, Canadian Journal of Law and Technology 19(2) (2022)
- Bryan Altman, Can’t We Just Talk About This First?: Making the Case for the Use of Discovery Depositions in Arkansas Criminal Cases, Arkansas Law Review 75(1) (2022)
- Tri Andari Dahlan, Slack on Evidence System: Entrance of “Coerced Corruption” to Public Procurement Mistakes in Indonesia
- Hirak Ranjan Dash, Pankaj Shrivastava and J. A. Lorente (eds), Handbook of DNA Profiling, Springer (2022)
- Eric Monroe, State v. Pelletier: Protecting the Balance Between Montana Rules of Evidence 404 and 607, Montana Law Review 83(1) (2022)
- Hal Stern, Statistical Considerations for the Analysis and Interpretation of Forensic Evidence, in Alicia L. Carriquiry, Judith M. Tanur and William F. Eddy (eds), Statistics in the Public Interest: In Memory of Stephen E. Fienberg, Springer (2022)
- Tom Lininger, Deconstructing Rules for Proof of Cognitive Impairments, in Micky Lee, Frank Rudy Cooper and Patricia Reeve (eds), Dis/ability in Media, Law and History: Intersectional, Embodied AND Socially Constructed? Routledge, 2022
- Archana Singh, Forensic Science: An Aid To Legal Justice System, Forensic Science E-Magazine 4 (2022)
- Philip D. Segrest Jr., The Art of Cross-Examination in PTAB Trials, Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property 21(2) (2022)
- Daniel Pollack and Helene M. Weiss, Lying to minors during interrogations should be illegal, New York Law Journal
- Ellen Podgor and Wilma Metcalf, ‘The Fox Guarding the Henhouse:’ Government Review of Attorney-Client Privileged Material in White Collar Cases, Boston University Law Review, Forthcoming
- Jeff Todd and Todd Jewell, Economic Evidence, Complex Litigation, and Tier One Soccer Across, California Western International Law Journal 52(2) (2022)
- João Paulo Piratelli, The Inference for the Best Explanation and the Crime of Cartel in the Context of the Car Wash Operation
- Deborah W. Denno, How Experts Have Dominated the Neuroscience Narrative in Criminal Cases for Twelve Decades: A Warning for the Future, 63 William & Mary L. Rev. 1215 (2022)